BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Moore Institute - ECPv6.0.0.1//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Moore Institute
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://mooreinstitute.ie
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Moore Institute
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Dublin
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:IST
DTSTART:20190331T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20191027T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Dublin:20190627T153000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Dublin:20191115T000000
DTSTAMP:20260516T183634
CREATED:20190621T135436Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20191108T104353Z
UID:7736-1561649400-1573776000@mooreinstitute.ie
SUMMARY:Exhibition- Laval Nugent - Warrior and Art Collector
DESCRIPTION:This exhibition developed by the Archaeological Museum in Zagreb and the Embassy of the Republic of Croatia celebrates the life and legacy of Irishman\, Count Laval Nugent of Westmeath.  Laval Nugent was Irish by birth\, a field marshal in the Austrian Army\, a negotiator during the Napoleonic Wars\, a Croatian national hero and a passionate art collector. \nThis exhibition is part of a programme of events highlighting the links between the cities of Galway\, Ireland and Rijeka\, Croatia – both European Capitals of Culture in 2020. \n 
URL:https://mooreinstitute.ie/event/exhibition-laval-nugent-warrior-and-art-collector/
LOCATION:Foyer the Hardiman Research Building\, Ireland
ORGANIZER;CN="Liz%20McConnell":MAILTO:liz.mcconnell@nuigalway.ie
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Dublin:20190702T140000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Dublin:20190702T140000
DTSTAMP:20260516T183634
CREATED:20190621T124031Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20190621T124031Z
UID:7728-1562076000-1562076000@mooreinstitute.ie
SUMMARY:What do we mean when we say we're “adding to the scientific literature”?
DESCRIPTION:  \nAbstract: Every undergrad finds out very fast that one of the most important activities of the faculty is publishing papers. Scientific papers are the coin of the realm in everything from health psychology to high-particle physics. No wonder\, considering so much is tied to publication: communicating research results to peers\, staking a claim on a discovery or a new approach\, building personal or lab prestige\, and landing a job or advancing in the tenure track. Supposedly\, all the previously listed benefits that flow from publishing are the consequence of social conventions which try to incentivize the core business of scientists i.e. producing reliable knowledge about the world. But where do those conventions come from\, why were they established and by whom\, and do they serve the intended purpose? In my talk\, I\nwill try to pick apart some of our intuitions about why we publish\, and what we hope to achieve with it. My argument will be based on two broad strategies: (1) using historical research on scientific journals and the publishing industry and (2) mobilizing and critically discussing some of the disruptive reform proposals for changing the existing journal/database/search engine systems. The idea is to open up space for a critical and reflexive discussion about what publishing means for scientists and see how to\nchange it for the better. \n  \nBio: Dr Ivan Flis is a Research Fellow at the Center for Advanced Studies in South-Eastern Europe at the University of Rijeka\, Croatia. He holds a PhD in history and philosophy of science (Utrecht University\, Netherlands) and MA and BA in psychology (University of Zagreb\, Croatia). His research focuses on the history of research methods in scientific psychology and the philosophical/historical study of the ongoing Open Science reform movement. He has published on the history of 20th century scientific psychology\, the replication crisis in psychology\, and digital humanities. By working at the intersection of history &amp; philosophy of science with psychology\, Ivan hopes to inform and improve psychological\nresearch by insights from the reflexive humanities disciplines critically studying science. In Galway\, he’s a visiting fellow at the Moore Institute\, working with Dr Chris Noone on topics related to the Open Science reform movement in psychology. \n 
URL:https://mooreinstitute.ie/event/what-do-we-mean-when-we-say-were-adding-to-the-scientific-literature/
LOCATION:Room AMBE 101\, Arts Millenium Building\, NUIG
ORGANIZER;CN="Chris%20Noone":MAILTO:chris.noone@nuigalway.ie
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Dublin:20190703T180000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Dublin:20190703T180000
DTSTAMP:20260516T183634
CREATED:20190628T105344Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20190628T105344Z
UID:7746-1562176800-1562176800@mooreinstitute.ie
SUMMARY:''Contemporary Indian Aesthetics:  Decolonizing\, Comparative and Cosmopolitan Perspectives'' by Moore Visiting Fellow Kanchana Mahadevan
DESCRIPTION:  \nABSTRACT:   The Kochi Biennale editions since 2012 or India Pavilion at the Venice Biennale 2019 are ample testimonies to the themes of decolonization\, comparative aesthetics and cosmopolitanism in contemporary Indian art practice.  Ananda Coomaraswamy and K.C. Bhattacharyya conceptualized these themes in the early twentieth century.   Their differences notwithstanding\, they argued for the necessity of decolonization in situating the Indian art object in a nationalist context\,.  However\, they also endorsed cosmopolitanism through their critical and comparative re-reading of classical Indian aesthetic tradition with reference to its Western counterpart.  Their interventions pose several questions: How does one read Coomaraswamy’s and Bhattacharya’s claims for a phenomenology of the Indian art object?  Can indigenous art that emerges through an engagement with a foreign tradition be distinct?  How does one negotiate conflicting hermeneutics of tradition? Is the identity of ‘Indian’ art related to cosmopolitanism?  This paper will engage with these questions\, which continue to be relevant to contemporary Indian art practice. \nABOUT THE SPEAKER:   Kanchana Mahadevan Professor\, Department of Philosophy\, University of Mumbai is at present Fellow at the Moore Institute\, National University of Ireland\, Galway.  
URL:https://mooreinstitute.ie/event/contemporary-indian-aesthetics-decolonizing-comparative-and-cosmopolitan-perspectives-by-moore-visiting-fellow-kanchana-mahadevan/
LOCATION:Tom Duddy Seminar Room\, Philosophy Department Morrisroe House\, Distillery Road
ORGANIZER;CN="Gerald%20Cipriani%2C":MAILTO:gerald.cipriani@nuigalway.ie
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Dublin:20190712T153000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Dublin:20190712T153000
DTSTAMP:20260516T183634
CREATED:20190705T085818Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20190705T085818Z
UID:7755-1562945400-1562945400@mooreinstitute.ie
SUMMARY:Tiomna Nuadh ar Dtighearna agus ar Slanaightheora Josa Criosd
DESCRIPTION:  \n  \nJohn Cox\, University Librarian\, is pleased to invite you to an event to mark the generous donation to the University of the \n Tiomna Nuadh ar Dtighearna agus ar Slanaightheora Josa Criosd \n By members of the Ó Dálaigh family\,  \nAthlone\, Co. Westmeath. \nThis was the first translation of the New Testament into Irish and \nwas created for the Church of Ireland by William Daniel (Uilliam Ó Domhnaill)\, archbishop of Tuam. Historian\, Ruairí Ó hAodha\, will speak about the background to the volume. \nRSVP (acceptances only): ann.cullinane@nuigalway.ie \nT:       091 492540 \n 
URL:https://mooreinstitute.ie/event/tiomna-nuadh-ar-dtighearna-agus-ar-slanaightheora-josa-criosd/
LOCATION:Seminar Room G010\, Hardiman Research Building
ORGANIZER;CN="Ann%20Cullinane":MAILTO:ann.cullinane@nuigalway.ie
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Dublin:20190722T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Dublin:20190722T120000
DTSTAMP:20260516T183634
CREATED:20190702T092010Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20190702T092010Z
UID:7752-1563796800-1563796800@mooreinstitute.ie
SUMMARY:Glitching the Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Malfunction
DESCRIPTION:  \n  \nWhile the word “glitch” is often still used to connote catastrophic failure\, videogamers have come to view glitches opportunistically\, as chances to intervene in game texts in ways unforeseen (and often unforeseeable) by their developers. \nMy presentation draws on a variety of game glitches and the alternate modes of textual navigation they enable to demonstrate how the glitch forces us to rethink even such basic concepts as plot\, character\, temporality\, and point of view\, ultimately showing how the resulting “narrative of malfunction” blends and reshapes digital studies\, narratology\, and queer/disability theory to establish brokenness\, error\, and failure as baseline states within which narrative “function” is at best temporary and often actively to be avoided. All texts are thus potentially glitched\, and much can be learned and accomplished within them by reading for the glitches. \n  \nAndrew Ferguson is a visiting assistant professor of digital studies in the Department of English at the University of Maryland. His work—located at the intersection of media-textual studies\, cultural theory\, and popular culture—may be found in Textual Cultures\, Hypermedia Joyce Studies\, and Science Fiction Studies among others. His ongoing projects include collections of essays on born-digital horror and “bad” art\, a critical biography of the Irish-American science fiction author R.A. Lafferty (soon to appear from the University of Illinois Press)\, and the manuscript on glitches and narrative theory from which this talk is adapted.
URL:https://mooreinstitute.ie/event/glitching-the-narrative-discourse-an-essay-in-malfunction/
LOCATION:Seminar Room G010\, Hardiman Research Building
ORGANIZER;CN="Justin%20Tonra":MAILTO:justin.tonra@nuigalway.ie
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20190723
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20190725
DTSTAMP:20260516T183634
CREATED:20190523T153105Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20190718T141025Z
UID:7595-1563840000-1564012799@mooreinstitute.ie
SUMMARY:Posthumanist Ecocriticism Postgraduate Summer School
DESCRIPTION:This summer school will investigate methods to communicate complex environmental objects such as climate change\, habitation\, or the human body as a structurally open spaces inhabited by microscopic life forms in competition or symbiosis with non living objects. In addition\, nano processes are being offered as solutions for large-scale geoengineering of the planet for climate mitigation\, such as nano-particles to reduce the Earth’s albedo\, and the use of nano tech in human enhancement discourses. We will engage with the ideological load of popular narratives\, such as right-wing cultures of preparation (i.e. providing a historical perspective of why people build shelters\, bunkers and other provisional escape places)\, religiously motivated discourses of separation or cohabitation with other species (transcorporeality)\, or the effects of hygiene management on forms of habitation. \nFraming environmental objects poses extreme narrative challenges with regard to scale\, for example\, in the case of large objects such as climate change\, its unboundedness\, incalculability\, and unthinkability\, but also\, at microscopic level\, in the case of thinking the human as a the community of other life forms. In both cases actions are required that exceed the scale in which we are used to operate\, at institutional\, infrastructural\, interpersonal and organisational level. \nPart of this ongoing and pressing task is to abstain from imposing worn out labels onto this delicate process of conceiving environmental continuities of texts\, beings and ecosystems\, which might in an underhanded way continue to inscribe traditional divisions and impositions. Instead\, it is calling forth forms of organisation without any precedent. \nThe recent posthumanist turn in ecocriticism\, we believe\, must proceed phenomenologically\, recognizing the constructedness of divisions within the compound continuum of life on earth\, their arbitrariness and the task of this generation as well as future generations to understand the constructedness of these divisions and search for viable alternatives. Constructivisms of all kinds have been and continue to be accompanied by a complementary yearning for authenticity\, the real and the material. \nIn recent years\, various strands of theoretical thinking categorised as ecocritical have challenged both the irrefutability and the frustration mentioned above from new perspectives. Taking their cue from innovative literary attempts to imagine\, depict and conceptualise the human-nature relationship and the place of human beings in a world under threat\, in this summer school we will take issue with the assumed omnipotence of social constructionism. The purpose of this workshop is to ask if there is an alternative to resignation in the face of this perceived inescapability without resorting to a naive insistence on the relevance of ‘the real’. Obviously\, an intellectual climate\, dominated by suspicion of the very idea of nature outside quotation marks is not conducive to a vigorous engagement with the problem. On the other hand\, Timothy Morton in “Ecology without Nature” made a convincing case for why the term “nature” needs to be abolished due to its ideological load as a “respite place” that enables us to tolerate modes of destruction. Acknowledging this\, in this workshop we will explore new ways to talk meaningfully about the gap between language and the world. \nSome of the areas that will be addressed are: \n\nThe world of population and climate crises exceeds the usual operational scales of political action\, at the institutional\, infrastructural\, interpersonal and organisational levels\, from the nano to the ‘hyperobject’ (Timothy Morton). Can we use ecocriticism to face the Open\, regardless of how and where we live?\nWhat are the sources of ideological inspiration for subcultures that are developing in the face of ecological collapse? What are the cultural and legal-political sources of the belief systems of ‘preppers’ (i.e. people making emergency preparations in the face of climate apocalypse)\, or of religiously motivated discourses of separation or cohabitation with other species?\nThe posthuman turn involves ‘rethinking the conceptual frameworks within which we have defined human subjectivity\, agency\, identity\, and self\, acknowledging the permeable boundaries of species in the natural-cultural continuum’ (Oppermann 2016\, 275).\n\n  \nProgramme: Posthumanist Ecocriticism Summerschool 23.-24. July 2019 \nDay 1: 2pm-4.30pm\, Bridge Room Hardiman Building 1001 \n  \n\n\n\nCommunity Matters \n \n\n\nAshley Cahillane\nEmbodying the Water Crisis: Environmental Justice and the Fate of California’s Water in Claire Vaye Watkins’ Gold Fame Citrus\n\n\nNiamh Donnellan\nDismantling Hegemonic Temporality to Aid Environment Justice \n \n\n\nZania Koppe\nLiving Differently on the Edges \n \n\n\nRoundtable Discussion\nTranscorporal Communities: Cohabitation with Other Species on a Warming Planet \n(chaired by Tina-Karen Pusse)\n\n\n\n  \nDay 2:  10am-1pm\, Bridge Room Hardiman Building 1001 \n  \n\n\n\nBetween Utopia and Dystopia: Posthuman Scenarios and Modes of Subjectivity  \n \n\n\nDaniel Mazurek \n \nCyberpunk as Postanthropocentric Narrative\n\n\nAndreas Weidlich\nResurrection from Ruins: Horizon Zero Dawn and the Production of Social Spaces\n\n\nSimone Klapper\nBetween Intrusion & Interconnection – The Parasite as a Figure of Interspecific Relational Subjectivity in Contemporary Literature and Film\n\n\nMaria Quigley\nFungus\, Futurity\, and the Fall of Humanity in M. R. Carey’s The Girl with all the Gifts\n\n\n\n  \nBreak \nKeynote Presentation: 2pm\, Hardiman Building Moore Seminar Room GO10 \n  \n\n\n\nHeike Schwarz\nDisaster Impending Somewhere: EcoGothic\, EcoHorror and Posthumanist Ecocriticism. \n \n\n\n\n  \n\n \n  \n  \n 
URL:https://mooreinstitute.ie/event/posthumanist-ecocriticism-postgraduate-summer-school/
LOCATION:Room 1001\, the Bridge\, Hardiman Research Building
ORGANIZER;CN="Tina-%20Karen%20Pusse":MAILTO:tina-karen.pusse@nuigalway.ie
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR